State Bar Court of California
Hearing Department
STIPULATION RE FACTS, CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW AND DISPOSITION AND ORDER APPROVING
ACTUAL SUSPENSION
Case Number(s): 08-O-13070
In the Matter of: Stephan C. Williams, Bar #37755, A Member
of the State Bar of California, (Respondent).
Counsel For The State Bar: Robert A. Henderson
Deputy Trial Counsel
180 Howard St.
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 538-2385
Bar # 173205
Counsel for Respondent: Roni Rotholz
1870 Olympic Blvd., #120
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
(925) 932-0193
Bar # 92448
Submitted to: Settlement Judge, State Bar Court Clerk’s
Office San Francisco.
Filed: October 04, 2011.
<<not>> checked. PREVIOUS STIPULATION REJECTED
Note: All
information required by this form and any additional information which cannot
be provided in the space provided, must be set forth in an attachment to this
stipulation under specific headings, e.g., "Facts," "Dismissals,"
"Conclusions of Law," "Supporting Authority," etc.
A. Parties' Acknowledgments:
1.
Respondent is a member of the State Bar of California, admitted January
11, 1966.
2.
The parties agree to be bound by the factual stipulations contained herein
even if conclusions of law or disposition are rejected or changed by the
Supreme Court.
3.
All investigations or proceedings listed by case number in the caption
of this stipulation are entirely resolved by this stipulation and are deemed
consolidated. Dismissed charge(s)/count(s) are listed under
"Dismissals." The stipulation consists of 12 pages, not
including the order.
4.
A statement of acts or omissions acknowledged by Respondent as cause or
causes for discipline is included under "Facts."
5.
Conclusions of law, drawn from and specifically referring to the facts
are also included under "Conclusions of Law".
6.
The parties must include supporting authority for the recommended level
of discipline under the heading "Supporting Authority."
7.
No more than 30 days prior to the filing of this stipulation, Respondent
has been advised in writing of any pending investigation/proceeding not
resolved by this stipulation, except for criminal investigations.
8.
Payment of Disciplinary Costs-Respondent acknowledges the provisions of
Bus. & Prof. Code §§6086.10 & 6140.7. (Check one option only):
checked. Until costs are paid in full,
Respondent will remain actually suspended from the practice of law unless
relief is obtained per rule 5.130, Rules of Procedure.
<<not>> checked. Costs are to be
paid in equal amounts prior to February 1 for the following membership years:
**. (Hardship, special circumstances or other good cause per rule 5.132,
Rules of Procedure.) If Respondent fails to pay any installment as
described above, or as may be modified by the State Bar Court, the remaining
balance is due and payable immediately.
<<not>> checked. Costs are waived
in part as set forth in a separate attachment entitled "Partial Waiver of
Costs".
<<not>> checked. Costs are
entirely waived.
B. Aggravating
Circumstances [for definition, see Standards for Attorney Sanctions for
Professional Misconduct, standard 1.2(b)]. Facts supporting aggravating
circumstances are required.
<<not>> checked. (1) Prior record of discipline [see
standard 1.2(f)]
<<not>> checked.
(a) State Bar Court case
# of prior case **.
<<not>> checked.
(b) Date prior discipline
effective **.
<<not>> checked.
(c) Rules of Professional
Conduct/ State Bar Act violations:**
<<not>> checked.
(d) Degree of prior
discipline **
<<not>> checked.
(e) If Respondent has two
or more incidents of prior discipline, use space provided below. **.
<<not>> checked. (2) Dishonesty: Respondent's
misconduct was surrounded by or followed by bad faith, dishonesty, concealment,
overreaching or other violations of the State Bar Act or Rules of Professional
Conduct.
checked. (3) Trust Violation: Trust funds or property were
involved and Respondent refused or was unable to account to the client or
person who was the object of the misconduct for improper conduct toward said
funds or property. See attachment
<<not>> checked. (4) Harm: Respondent's misconduct
harmed significantly a client, the public or the administration of justice.
<<not>> checked. (5) Indifference: Respondent
demonstrated indifference toward rectification of or atonement for the
consequences of his or her misconduct.
<<not>> checked. (6) Lack of Cooperation: Respondent
displayed a lack of candor and cooperation to victims of his/her misconduct or
to the State Bar during disciplinary investigation or proceedings.
<<not>> checked. (7) Multiple/Pattern of Misconduct:
Respondent's current misconduct evidences multiple acts of wrongdoing or
demonstrates a pattern of misconduct.
<<not>> checked. (8) No aggravating circumstances are
involved.
Additional aggravating circumstances: **.
C. Mitigating Circumstances [see standard 1.2(e)]. Facts supporting
mitigating circumstances are required.
<<not>>
checked. (1) No Prior Discipline:
Respondent has no prior record of discipline over many years of practice
coupled with present misconduct which is not deemed serious. **
<<not>>
checked. (2) No Harm: Respondent did
not harm the client or person who was the object of the misconduct. **
<<not>>
checked. (3) Candor/Cooperation:
Respondent displayed spontaneous candor and cooperation with the victims of
his/her misconduct and to the State Bar during disciplinary investigation and
proceedings. **
<<not>>
checked. (4) Remorse: Respondent
promptly took objective steps spontaneously demonstrating remorse and
recognition of the wrongdoing, which steps were designed to timely atone for
any consequences of his/her misconduct. **
<<not>>
checked. (5) Restitution: Respondent
paid $ ** on ** in restitution to ** without the threat or
force of disciplinary, civil or criminal proceedings. **
<<not>>
checked. (6) Delay: These
disciplinary proceedings were excessively delayed. The delay is not
attributable to Respondent and the delay prejudiced him/her. **
<<not>>
checked. (7) Good Faith: Respondent
acted in good faith. **
<<not>>
checked. (8) Emotional/Physical
Difficulties: At the time of the stipulated act or acts of professional
misconduct Respondent suffered extreme emotional difficulties or physical
disabilities which expert testimony would establish was directly responsible
for the misconduct. The difficulties or disabilities were not the product
of any illegal conduct by the member, such as illegal drug or substance abuse,
and Respondent no longer suffers from such difficulties or disabilities. **
<<not>>
checked. (9) Severe Financial Stress:
At the time of the misconduct, Respondent suffered from severe financial stress
which resulted from circumstances not reasonably foreseeable or which were
beyond his/her control and which were directly responsible for the misconduct.
**
<<not>>
checked. (10) Family Problems: At the time of the misconduct, Respondent
suffered extreme difficulties in his/her personal life which were other than
emotional or physical in nature. **
<<not>>
checked. (11) Good Character: Respondent's good character is attested to
by a wide range of references in the legal and general communities who are
aware of the full extent of his/her misconduct. **
<<not>>
checked. (12) Rehabilitation: Considerable time has passed since the acts
of professional misconduct occurred followed by convincing proof of subsequent
rehabilitation. **
<<not>>
checked. (13) No mitigating circumstances are involved. **
Additional mitigating circumstances: **
D.
Discipline:
checked.
(1)
Stayed Suspension:
checked.
(a) Respondent must be suspended from the practice of law for a period of
one-year.
<<not>>
checked. i. and until Respondent shows proof satisfactory to the State Bar
Court of rehabilitation and present fitness to practice and present learning
and ability in the law pursuant to standard 1.4(c)(ii) Standards for Attorney
Sanctions for Professional Misconduct.
checked. ii. and
until Respondent pays restitution as set forth in the Financial Conditions form
attached to this stipulation.
<<not>>
checked. iii. and until Respondent does the following: **.
<<not>>
checked. (b) The above-referenced suspension is stayed.
checked. (2) Probation: Respondent must be placed on probation
for a period of two-years, which will commence upon the effective date of the
Supreme Court order in this matter. (See rule 9.18, California Rules of
Court.)
checked. (3) Actual Suspension:
checked.
(a) Respondent must be actually suspended from the practice of law in the State
of California for a period of 90-days.
<<not>>
checked. i. and until Respondent shows proof satisfactory to the State Bar
Court of rehabilitation and present fitness to practice and present learning
and ability in the law pursuant to standard 1.4(c)(ii), Standards for Attorney
Sanctions for Professional Misconduct
checked. ii. and until
Respondent pays restitution as set forth in the Financial Conditions form
attached to this stipulation.
<<not>>
checked. iii. and until Respondent does the following: **.
E. Additional Conditions of Probation:
<<not>>
checked. (1) If Respondent is actually suspended for
two years or more, he/she must remain actually suspended until ** he/she proves
to the State Bar Court his/her rehabilitation, fitness to practice, and
learning and ability in the general law, pursuant to standard 1.4(c)(ii),
Standards for Attorney Sanctions for Professional Misconduct.
checked.
(2)
During the probation period, Respondent must comply with the provisions of the
State Bar Act and Rules of Professional Conduct.
checked.
(3)
Within ten (10) days of any change, Respondent must report to the Membership
Records Office of the State Bar and to the Office of Probation of the State Bar
of California ("Office of Probation"), all changes of information,
including current office address and telephone number, or other address for
State Bar purposes, as prescribed by section 6002.1 of the Business and
Professions Code.
checked.
(4)
Within thirty (30) days from the effective date of discipline, Respondent must
contact the Office of Probation and schedule a meeting with Respondent's
assigned probation deputy to discuss these terms and conditions of probation.
Upon the direction of the Office of Probation, Respondent must meet with the
probation deputy either in-person or by telephone. During the period of
probation, Respondent must promptly meet with the probation deputy as directed
and upon request.
checked.
(5)
Respondent must submit written quarterly reports to the Office of Probation on
each January 10, April 10, July 10, and October 10 of the period of probation.
Under penalty of perjury, Respondent must state whether Respondent has complied
with the State Bar Act, the Rules of Professional Conduct, and all conditions
of probation during the preceding calendar quarter. Respondent must also state
whether there are any proceedings pending against him or her in the State Bar
Court and if so, the case number and current status of that proceeding. If the
first report would cover less than 30 days, that report must be submitted on
the next quarter date, and cover the extended period.
In addition to all quarterly reports, a final report, containing the same
information, is due no earlier than twenty (20) days before the last day of the
period of probation and no later than the last day of probation.
<<not>>
checked. (6) Respondent must be assigned a probation
monitor. Respondent must promptly review the terms and conditions of probation
with the probation monitor to establish a manner and schedule of compliance.
During the period of probation, Respondent must furnish to the monitor such
reports as may be requested, in addition to the quarterly reports required to
be submitted to the Office of Probation. Respondent must cooperate fully with
the probation monitor.
checked.
(7)
Subject to assertion of applicable privileges, Respondent must answer fully,
promptly and truthfully any inquiries of the Office of Probation and any
probation monitor assigned under these conditions which are directed to
Respondent personally or in writing relating to whether Respondent is complying
or has complied with the probation conditions.
checked.
(8)
Within one (1) year of the effective date of the discipline herein, Respondent
must provide to the Office of Probation satisfactory proof of attendance at a
session of the Ethics School, and passage of the test given at the end of that
session.
No Ethics School recommended. Reason: **.
<<not>>
checked. (9) Respondent must comply with all conditions
of probation imposed in the underlying criminal matter and must so declare
under penalty of perjury in conjunction with any quarterly report to be filed
with the Office of Probation.
checked.
(10)
The following conditions are attached hereto and incorporated:
<<not>> checked. Substance
Abuse Conditions.
<<not>> checked. Law Office
Management Conditions.
<<not>> checked. Medical
Conditions.
checked. Financial Conditions.
F. Other Conditions Negotiated by the Parties:
checked.
(1)
Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination: Respondent must
provide proof of passage of the Multistate Professional Responsibility
Examination ("MPRE"), administered by the National Conference of Bar
Examiners, to the Office of Probation during the period of actual suspension or
within one year, whichever period is longer. Failure to pass the MPRE
results in actual suspension without further hearing until passage. But see
rule 9.10(b), California Rules of Court, and rule 5.162(A) & (E), Rules of
Procedure.
<<not>> checked. No MPRE recommended. Reason: **.
checked.
(2)
Rule 9.20, California Rules of Court: Respondent must comply with the
requirements of rule 9.20, California Rules of Court, and perform the acts
specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar
days, respectively, after the effective date of the Supreme Court's Order in
this matter.
<<not>> checked. (3) Conditional
Rule 9.20, California Rules of Court: If Respondent remains actually
suspended for 90 days or more, he/she must comply with the requirements of rule
9.20, California Rules of Court, and perform the acts specified in subdivisions
(a) and (c) of that rule within 120 and 130 calendar days, respectively, after
the effective date of the Supreme Court's Order in this matter.
<<not>> checked. (4) Credit for
Interim Suspension [conviction referral cases only]: Respondent will be
credited for the period of his/her interim suspension toward the stipulated
period of actual suspension. Date of commencement of interim suspension: **.
<<not>> checked. (5) Other
Conditions: **.
Attachment language (if any):**.
(Effective
January 1, 2011)
Actual
Suspension
FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
Case Number(s): 08-O-13070
In the Matter of: Stephan C. Williams
a.
Restitution
checked. Respondent must pay
restitution (including the principal amount, plus interest of 10% per annum) to
the payee(s) listed below. If the Client Security Fund (“CSF”) has reimbursed
one or more of the payee(s) for all or any portion of the principal amount(s)
listed below, Respondent must also pay restitution to CSF in the amount(s)
paid, plus applicable interest and costs.
1.
Payee: VA Hospital
Principal Amount: $1,500.00
Interest Accrues From: November 9, 2006
2.
Payee: Continental Reporting Service
Principal Amount: $671.00
Interest Accrues From: November 9, 2006
<<not>> checked.
Respondent must pay above-referenced restitution and provide satisfactory proof
of payment to the Office of Probation not later than **.
b. Installment Restitution Payments
<<not>> checked.
Respondent must pay the above-referenced restitution on the payment schedule
set forth below. Respondent must provide satisfactory proof of payment to the
Office of Probation with each quarterly probation report, or as otherwise
directed by the Office of Probation. No later than 30 days prior to the
expiration of the period of probation (or period of reproval), Respondent must
make any necessary final payment(s) in order to complete the payment of
restitution, including interest, in full.
<<not>> checked. If
Respondent fails to pay any installment as described above, or as may be
modified by the State Bar Court, the remaining balance is due and payable
immediately.
c. Client Funds Certificate
<<not>>
checked.
1. If Respondent possesses client funds
at any time during the period covered by a required quarterly report,
Respondent must file with each required report a certificate from Respondent
and/or a certified public accountant or other financial professional approved
by the Office of Probation, certifying that:
a. Respondent has maintained a bank
account in a bank authorized to do business in the State of California, at a
branch located within the State of California, and that such account is
designated as a “Trust Account” or “Clients’ Funds Account”;
b. Respondent has kept and maintained the
following:
i.
A written ledger for each
client on whose behalf funds are held that sets forth:
1. the name of such client;
2. the date, amount and source of all
funds received on behalf of such client;
3. the date, amount, payee and purpose of
each disbursement made on behalf of such client; and,
4. the current balance for such client.
ii.
a written journal for
each client trust fund account that sets forth:
1. the name of such account;
2. the date, amount and client affected
by each debit and credit; and,
3. the current balance in such account.
iii.
all bank statements and
cancelled checks for each client trust account; and,
iv.
each monthly
reconciliation (balancing) of (i), (ii), and (iii), above, and if there are any
differences between the monthly total balances reflected in (i), (ii), and
(iii), above, the reasons for the differences.
c. Respondent has maintained a written
journal of securities or other properties held for clients that specifies:
i.
each item of security and
property held;
ii.
the person on whose
behalf the security or property is held;
iii.
the date of receipt of
the security or property;
iv.
the date of distribution
of the security or property; and,
v.
the person to whom the
security or property was distributed.
2. If Respondent does not possess any
client funds, property or securities during the entire period covered by a
report, Respondent must so state under penalty of perjury in the report filed
with the Office of Probation for that reporting period. In this circumstance,
Respondent need not file the accountant’s certificate described above.
3. The requirements of this condition are
in addition to those set forth in rule 4-100, Rules of Professional Conduct.
d. Client Trust Accounting School
<<not>> checked. Within
one (1) year of the effective date of the discipline herein, Respondent must
supply to the Office of Probation satisfactory proof of attendance at a session
of the Ethics School Client Trust Accounting School, within the same period of
time, and passage of the test given at the end of that session.
(Effective
January 1, 2011)
Financial
Conditions
SIGNATURE OF THE PARTIES
Case Number(s): 08-O-13070
In the Matter of: Stephan C. Williams
By their
signatures below, the parties and their counsel, as applicable, signify their
agreement with each of the recitation and each of the terms and conditions of
this Stipulation Re Facts, Conclusions of Law and Disposition.
Signed by:
Respondent:
Stephan C. Williams
Date:
September 9, 2011
Respondent’s
Counsel: Roni Rotholz
Date:
9/9/2011
Deputy Trial
Counsel: Robert A. Henerson
Date:9/19/11
ACTUAL SUSPENSION ORDER
Case Number(s): Stephan C. Williams
In the Matter of: 08-O-13070
Finding the
stipulation to be fair to the parties and that it adequately protects the
public, IT IS ORDERED that the requested dismissal of counts/charges, if any is
GRANTED without prejudice, and:
checked.
The stipulated facts and disposition are APPROVED AS MODIFIED as set forth
below, and the DISCIPLINE IS RECOMMENDED to the Supreme Court.
The parties
are bound by the stipulation as approved unless: 1) a motion to withdraw or
modify the stipulation, filed within 15 days after service of this order, is
granted; or 2) this court modifies or further modifies the approved
stipulation. (See rule 5.58 (E) & (F), Rules of Procedure.) The effective
date of this disposition is the effective date of the Supreme Court order herein,
normally 30 days after the file date. (See rule 9.18(a), California Rules of
Court.)
Signed by:
Judge of the
State Bar Court: Pat McElroy
Date: October
4, 2011
(Effective
January 1, 2011)
Actual
Suspension Order
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
[Rules Proc. of State Bar; Rule
5.27(B); Code Civ. Proc., § 1013a(4)]
I am a Case
Administrator of the State Bar Court of California. I am over the age of
eighteen and not a party to the within proceeding. Pursuant to standard court
practice, in the City and County of San Francisco, on October 4, 2011, I
deposited a true copy of the following document(s):
STIPULATION
RE FACTS, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DISPOSITION AND ORDER APPROVING
in a sealed
envelope for collection and mailing on that date as follows:
checked. by first-class mail, with
postage thereon fully prepaid, through the United States Postal Service at San
Francisco, California, addressed as follows:
RONI ROTHOLZ
1870 OLYMPIC BLVD #120
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596-5067
checked. by interoffice mail through a
facility regularly maintained by the State Bar of California addressed as
follows:
ROBERT HENDERSON, Enforcement, San Francisco
I hereby
certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in San Francisco,
California, on October 4, 2011.
Signed by:
Lauretta
Cramer
Case
Administrator
State Bar
Court