George Axel Boryan # 70226 - Attorney Licensee Search

Attorney Profile

George Axel Boryan #70226

License Status: Resigned

CONSUMER ALERT

This attorney has resigned from the practice of law with disciplinary charges pending. As a result, the attorney is ineligible to practice law in California. The State Bar posts consumer alerts online when attorneys resign with disciplinary charges pending. The decision(s) or order(s) are posted on the State Bar Court Smart Search. Anyone who believes they have been the victim of attorney misconduct is urged to file a complaint with the State Bar.

Address: Boryan, Fenster & Griego, 111 W. St. John St.,#404, San Jose, CA 95113

Phone: Not Available  |  Fax: Not Available

Email: Not Available  |  Website: Not Available

  • More about This Attorney

License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History

All changes of license status due to nondisciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions.

Date License Status  Discipline  Administrative Action 
Present Resigned    
11/28/1986 Resigned   Resignation with charges pending
5/30/1986 Not eligible to practice law in CA  
12/22/1976 Admitted to the State Bar of California

Here is what you need to know to access discipline documents in public cases:

Documents are added to the State Bar Court’s online docket as events occur.


To search for a case, please copy the case number displayed above and click Search for a Case. In the search box, paste the complete case number. If the case number begins with “19” or higher, you must add the prefix SBC to the case number, e.g., SBC [CASE NUMBER]. If a case number begins with 18 or lower, there’s no need to add SBC.

Most public case records since 2000 are available through search. Older case records are available on request. The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005.

NOTE: Only Published Opinions may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings.

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The licensee is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Additional Information:


Start New Search »