Peter Smith Fullerton # 86798 - Attorney Licensee Search

Attorney Profile

Peter Smith Fullerton #86798

License Status: Not Eligible to Practice Law

Address: 61 Cardigan St, London SE11 5PF, ENGLAND

Phone: 1715870117  |  Fax: Not Available

Email: Not Available  |  Website: Not Available

  • More about This Attorney

License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History

All changes of license status due to nondisciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions.

Date License Status  Discipline  Administrative Action 
Present Not eligible to practice law in CA    
9/1/2001 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Suspended, failed to pay fees  
9/1/2001 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance  
1/8/2001 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 95-O-18765
2/1/1999 Active  
6/29/1997 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Discipline w/actual suspension 95-O-18765
8/29/1996   Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-18765
8/29/1994 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Suspended, failed to pay fees  
5/31/1979 Admitted to the State Bar of California

Here is what you need to know to access discipline documents in public cases:

Documents are added to the State Bar Court’s online docket as events occur.


To search for a case, please copy the case number displayed above and click Search for a Case. In the search box, paste the complete case number. If the case number begins with “19” or higher, you must add the prefix SBC to the case number, e.g., SBC [CASE NUMBER]. If a case number begins with 18 or lower, there’s no need to add SBC.

Most public case records since 2000 are available through search. Older case records are available on request. The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005.

NOTE: Only Published Opinions may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings.

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The licensee is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Additional Information:


Start New Search »