Attorney Profile
John Ingraham Meeker #95878
License Status: Resigned
|
CONSUMER ALERT
This attorney has resigned from the practice of law with disciplinary charges pending. As a result, the attorney is ineligible to practice law in California. The State Bar posts consumer alerts online when attorneys resign with disciplinary charges pending. The decision(s) or order(s) are posted on the State Bar Court Smart Search. Anyone who believes they have been the victim of attorney misconduct is urged to file a complaint with the State Bar. |
Address: Law Ofc John I Meeker, 1500 W El Camino Ave # 414, Sacramento, CA 95833
Phone: 916-812-4298 | Fax: 916-244-2622
Email: uhqtmcte@uig.compeyetqdj@fbala.netkbendhkpr@sqwwww.edufwkyjwrub@lkiumuhg.govddsyde@butglem.comigmotn@tnmnrr.edunjgfn@fnfeubhp.govsmbtg@wiwue.netouhwc@ftw.comjrngjn@bfhdhu.comfotpqet@nptb.netalcbysd@uymrrw.netjneunhkj@rfd.eduoqwmgqde@kmkimtb.edulojmsac@yahoo.comayjrqmm@cscalpo.comfcdjjw@krkj.netehei@lwqcjfpg.comyekr@beyj.edurbqdm@leqbobd.gov | Website: Not Available
License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History
The table below shows an attorney’s license status changes, disciplinary actions, and administrative actions. Some administrative suspensions are subject to automatic removal from the attorney profile page pursuant to the State Bar's policy on removal of administrative actions. Administrative suspensions are non-disciplinary actions resulting from noncompliance with administrative requirements, such as the requirement to pay licensing fees or comply with Minimum Continuing Legal Education. Administrative suspensions that meet the criteria in the State Bar's policy on removal of administrative actions would not be displayed below.
| Date | License Status | Discipline | Administrative Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Present | Resigned | ||
| 6/12/2009 | Resigned | Resignation with charges pending 08-Q-13347 | |
| 8/28/2008 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) | |
| 3/19/2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Ordered inactive | |
| 2/28/2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Discipline w/actual suspension 02-PM-13802 | |
| 8/16/2003 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Ordered inactive 02-PM-13802 | |
| 3/24/2002 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 01-PM-01665 | ||
| 12/21/2000 | Active | ||
| 8/17/2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Discipline w/actual suspension 99-PM-11242 | |
| 2/3/2000 | Active | ||
| 8/11/1999 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 96-O-04110 | |
| 3/2/1999 | Active | ||
| 7/31/1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Discipline w/actual suspension 96-O-04110 | |
| 4/10/1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-O-04110 | ||
| 2/7/1993 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 92-P-12660 | ||
| 4/20/1992 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 92-P-12660 | ||
| 6/22/1991 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 87-O-17892 | ||
| 3/17/1989 | Public reproval with/duties 87-O-14091 | ||
| 12/16/1980 | Admitted to the State Bar of California | ||
State Bar Court Cases
The listing below is partial, as the State Bar Court is transitioning to online dockets. Please refer to the License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History section above for a record of discipline cases. Case dockets and documents may be available using the State Bar Court Search for a Case feature; see instructions below.
Here is what you need to know to access discipline documents in public cases:
Documents are added to the State Bar Court’s online docket as events occur.
Most public case records since 2000 are available through search. Older case records are available on request. The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005.
NOTE: Only Published Opinions may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings.
DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The licensee is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.
Additional Information: