Attorney Profile
Wayne Jerome Johnson #112588
License Status: Not Eligible to Practice Law
|
CONSUMER ALERT
This attorney has been charged with a felony. The felony matter is pending in Contra Costa County Superior Court, Case number 05-190590-0 and in California Court of Appeal, First District, Case number A159389. For more information, contact the court in the jurisdiction where the case is pending. The State Bar posts consumer alerts online when lawyers are charged in a criminal court with a felony or felonies. Anyone who believes they have been the victim of attorney misconduct is urged to file a complaint with the State Bar. DISCLAIMER: The filing of criminal charges does not constitute a finding of guilt or professional misconduct. Criminal defendants are presumed to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. |
|
CONSUMER ALERT
The State Bar has placed this attorney on involuntary inactive status. As a result, the attorney is ineligible to practice law in California. The State Bar posts consumer alerts online in most instances when attorneys are placed on involuntary inactive status. The decision(s) or order(s) are posted on the State Bar Court Smart Search. Anyone who believes they have been the victim of attorney misconduct is urged to file a complaint with the State Bar. |
|
CONSUMER ALERT
The State Bar has placed this attorney on involuntary inactive status. As a result, the attorney is ineligible to practice law in California. The State Bar posts consumer alerts online in most instances when attorneys are placed on involuntary inactive status. Anyone who believes they have been the victim of attorney misconduct is urged to file a complaint with the State Bar. |
|
CONSUMER ALERT
The State Bar has placed this attorney on involuntary inactive status. As a result, the attorney is ineligible to practice law in California. The State Bar posts consumer alerts online in most instances when attorneys are placed on involuntary inactive status. Anyone who believes they have been the victim of attorney misconduct is urged to file a complaint with the State Bar. |
Address: PO Box 19157, Oakland, CA 94619
Phone: 510-451-1166 | Fax: Not Available
Email: Not Available | Website: Not Available
License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History
The table below shows an attorney’s license status changes, disciplinary actions, and administrative actions. Some administrative suspensions are subject to automatic removal from the attorney profile page pursuant to the State Bar's policy on removal of administrative actions. Administrative suspensions are non-disciplinary actions resulting from noncompliance with administrative requirements, such as the requirement to pay licensing fees or comply with Minimum Continuing Legal Education. Administrative suspensions that meet the criteria in the State Bar's policy on removal of administrative actions would not be displayed below.
| Date | License Status | Discipline | Administrative Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Present | Not eligible to practice law in CA | ||
| 7/2/2024 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance | |
| 6/15/2020 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Interim suspension after conviction 20-C-30267 | |
| 4/24/2020 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 20-C-30267 | ||
| 12/3/2019 | Not eligible to practice law in CA | Admin Inactive/FP noncompliance | |
| 3/10/2000 | Active | ||
| 1/1/2000 | Inactive | ||
| 12/12/1983 | Admitted to the State Bar of California | ||
Here is what you need to know to access discipline documents in public cases:
Documents are added to the State Bar Court’s online docket as events occur.
Most public case records since 2000 are available through search. Older case records are available on request. The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005.
NOTE: Only Published Opinions may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings.
DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The licensee is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.
Additional Information: