Rebecca Amelia Tapia # 83053 - Attorney Licensee Search

Attorney Profile

Rebecca Amelia Tapia #83053

License Status: Disbarred

This licensee is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.

CONSUMER ALERT

This attorney is disbarred from the practice of law. As a result, the attorney is ineligible to practice law in California. The State Bar posts consumer alerts online when attorneys are disbarred. The decision(s) or order(s) are posted on the State Bar Court Smart Search. Anyone who believes they have been the victim of attorney misconduct is urged to file a complaint with the State Bar.

Address: 5723 Portal Dr, Houston, TX 77096

Phone: 310-422-5196  |  Fax: Not Available

Email: Not Available  |  Website: Not Available

  • More about This Attorney

License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History

The table below shows an attorney’s license status changes, disciplinary actions, and administrative actions. Some administrative suspensions are subject to automatic removal from the attorney profile page pursuant to the State Bar's policy on removal of administrative actions. Administrative suspensions are non-disciplinary actions resulting from noncompliance with administrative requirements, such as the requirement to pay licensing fees or comply with Minimum Continuing Legal Education. Administrative suspensions that meet the criteria in the State Bar's policy on removal of administrative actions would not be displayed below.

Date License Status  Discipline  Administrative Action 
Present Disbarred    
9/21/2017 Disbarred   Disbarment 16-N-10524
4/22/2017 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Ordered inactive 16-N-10524
11/29/2016   Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 16-N-10524
10/15/2015 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Discipline w/actual suspension 14-O-03417
4/24/2015 Inactive  
11/12/2014   Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 14-O-03417
8/26/2010 Active  
2/11/2010 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Discipline w/actual suspension 03-C-05219
3/19/2004   Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 03-C-05219
7/28/1997 Active  
7/27/1997 Inactive  
6/26/1996   Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-15304
10/31/1995 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Interim suspension after conviction 93-C-12612
9/19/1995   Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 93-C-12612
1/1/1995 Inactive  
11/29/1978 Admitted to the State Bar of California

State Bar Court Cases

The listing below is partial, as the State Bar Court is transitioning to online dockets. Please refer to the License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History section above for a record of discipline cases. Case dockets and documents may be available using the State Bar Court Search for a Case feature; see instructions below.

Effective Date  Case Number Description 
9/21/2017 16-O-13930 Stipulation [PDF]
10/15/2015 14-O-3417 Stipulation [PDF]
2/4/2011 03-C-05219 Modification Order [PDF]
8/26/2010 03-C-05219 Order [PDF]
2/11/2010 03-C-05219 Stipulation [PDF]
2/11/2010 07-O-14520 Stipulation [PDF]
2/11/2010 06-O-10738 Stipulation [PDF]
2/11/2010 03-C-05219 Decision [PDF] [WORD]

Here is what you need to know to access discipline documents in public cases:

Documents are added to the State Bar Court’s online docket as events occur.


To search for a case, please copy the case number displayed above and click Search for a Case. In the search box, paste the complete case number. If the case number begins with “19” or higher, you must add the prefix SBC to the case number, e.g., SBC [CASE NUMBER]. If a case number begins with 18 or lower, there’s no need to add SBC.

Most public case records since 2000 are available through search. Older case records are available on request. The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005.

NOTE: Only Published Opinions may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings.

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The licensee is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Additional Information:


Start New Search »